DL Layers, Neurons and Dimensions
Layer - (5, 10) means 5 input Features 10 neurons.
Neuron - Single Scalar Output Per Neuron. Uses Wx Matrix and Bias.
ReLU - Rectified Linear Unit: (x > 0? x : 0)
User: Munian A (munian.alagan@gmail.com)
Created: 3/28/2025 22:02
Explain what is the responsibility of single neuron -- does it produce single scalar value or vector ? Explain with a simple working pytorch code.
Great question! Let's break it down step by step.
Input Layer:
First Hidden Layer:
Second Hidden Layer:
Output Layer:
Yes! Each neuron processes the entire input it receives and outputs a single scalar value. This value is placed at a fixed position in the output vector, and each neuron contributes separately to the formation of the next layer's input.
Below is a simple PyTorch example demonstrating these transformations:
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
# Define a simple neural network
class SimpleNN(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(SimpleNN, self).__init__()
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(5, 10) # First hidden layer (5 -> 10)
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(10, 6) # Second hidden layer (10 -> 6)
self.fc3 = nn.Linear(6, 3) # Output layer (6 -> 3)
def forward(self, x):
x = F.relu(self.fc1(x)) # Activation for first hidden layer
x = F.relu(self.fc2(x)) # Activation for second hidden layer
x = self.fc3(x) # No activation here; logits output
return x
# Simulating input
batch_size = 4 # Assume we process 4 samples at a time
input_data = torch.randn(batch_size, 5) # Random input tensor with 5 features
# Create model and pass input through it
model = SimpleNN()
output = model(input_data)
print("Input shape:", input_data.shape) # (4, 5)
print("Output shape after first hidden layer:", F.relu(model.fc1(input_data)).shape) # (4, 10)
print("Output shape after second hidden layer:", F.relu(model.fc2(F.relu(model.fc1(input_data)))).shape) # (4, 6)
print("Final output shape:", output.shape) # (4, 3)
nn.Linear(a, b)
defines a fully connected layer with weights of shape (b, a)
.ReLU
activation (F.relu()
) for the hidden layers.Input shape: torch.Size([4, 5])
Output shape after first hidden layer: torch.Size([4, 10])
Output shape after second hidden layer: torch.Size([4, 6])
Final output shape: torch.Size([4, 3])
Let me know if you need further clarification! 🚀
Here's an enhanced version of your PyTorch code that includes:
N
epochsimport torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
import torch.optim as optim
# Define the Neural Network
class SimpleNN(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(SimpleNN, self).__init__()
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(5, 10) # First hidden layer (5 -> 10)
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(10, 6) # Second hidden layer (10 -> 6)
self.fc3 = nn.Linear(6, 3) # Output layer (6 -> 3)
def forward(self, x):
x = F.relu(self.fc1(x)) # Activation for first hidden layer
x = F.relu(self.fc2(x)) # Activation for second hidden layer
x = self.fc3(x) # No activation (logits output)
return x
# Hyperparameters
num_epochs = 20
batch_size = 8
learning_rate = 0.01
# Simulated dataset (random inputs and labels)
num_samples = 100 # Assume we have 100 samples
X = torch.randn(num_samples, 5) # 100 samples, 5 features each
y = torch.randint(0, 3, (num_samples,)) # 100 labels in range [0,2] (3 classes)
# Model, loss function, optimizer
model = SimpleNN()
criterion = nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
optimizer = optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=learning_rate)
# Training loop
for epoch in range(num_epochs):
total_loss = 0.0
for i in range(0, num_samples, batch_size):
inputs = X[i:i + batch_size]
labels = y[i:i + batch_size]
# Forward pass
outputs = model(inputs)
loss = criterion(outputs, labels)
# Backward pass and optimization
optimizer.zero_grad()
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
total_loss += loss.item()
# Print epoch loss
print(f"Epoch [{epoch + 1}/{num_epochs}], Loss: {total_loss / (num_samples // batch_size):.4f}")
print("Training Complete!")
✅ Training loop with num_epochs
✅ Mini-batch training with batch_size
✅ CrossEntropyLoss (since it's a classification problem)
✅ Adam optimizer for efficient learning
✅ Prints loss per epoch for tracking training progress
This code will train the model using random data—replace X
and y
with real data for actual training. 🚀 Let me know if you need further improvements!
In the above code the final output layer produces raw logit values, but in the input we have fixed class labels. Above code does not directly use softmax function to translate logit values to class values -- still above code works implicitly finding the loss ? please clarify.
Great observation! The reason the code works without explicitly applying Softmax is because of how CrossEntropyLoss
works in PyTorch.
In PyTorch, nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
expects raw logits as input (not probabilities). Internally, it applies Softmax and Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) loss in one step.
So, when the model outputs raw logits, CrossEntropyLoss
automatically:
Thus, the code implicitly handles the softmax transformation during loss computation.
For each sample, the model outputs raw logits (before Softmax), e.g.:
Logits from final layer: [2.0, -1.0, 0.5] # Example output
Softmax converts this into probabilities:
Probabilities: [0.71, 0.04, 0.25] # Softmax applied internally
If the actual class label is 0
, the loss for this sample would be:
Loss = -log(0.71) = 0.34 # Negative log probability of the correct class
CrossEntropyLoss
does this automatically for all training samples.
If we modified the model to apply F.softmax(output, dim=1)
, we should NOT use CrossEntropyLoss
. Instead, we would need to use nn.NLLLoss()
(Negative Log-Likelihood Loss) because CrossEntropyLoss
already applies Softmax internally.
output = F.softmax(model(inputs), dim=1) # Applying softmax manually
loss = nn.NLLLoss()(torch.log(output), labels) # Log applied before NLLLoss
However, this is unnecessary because CrossEntropyLoss
already does both steps.
✅ Raw logits are passed to CrossEntropyLoss
, and it automatically applies Softmax.
✅ No need to explicitly apply Softmax before computing loss.
✅ If Softmax was applied manually, we’d have to change the loss function accordingly.
This design is efficient because it avoids redundant calculations and improves numerical stability. Let me know if you need further clarification! 🚀
What is the best way to visualize this deep learning layers transformation which clearly depicts the input , output dimensions and data flow ?
Great question! The best way to visualize deep learning transformations (input, output dimensions, and data flow) depends on the level of detail you want. Here are some effective approaches:
A simple tabular format helps clarify input-output transformations:
Layer | Input Shape | Weight Shape | Output Shape | Activation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Input | (batch_size, 5) | - | (batch_size, 5) | - |
FC1 (Hidden) | (batch_size, 5) | (10, 5) | (batch_size, 10) | ReLU |
FC2 (Hidden) | (batch_size, 10) | (6, 10) | (batch_size, 6) | ReLU |
Output Layer | (batch_size, 6) | (3, 6) | (batch_size, 3) | (Logits) |
This method clearly shows dimensions at each step.
summary()
(Automatic Model Summary)For a PyTorch model, you can use torchsummary
:
from torchsummary import summary
model = SimpleNN()
summary(model, (5,))
This will print a detailed architecture with input/output sizes.
A simple block diagram makes it visually appealing:
(Input: batch_size x 5) ───► [FC1: 10 neurons] ───► ReLU ───►
[FC2: 6 neurons] ───► ReLU ───► [Output: 3 logits]
Each arrow shows data flow.
If you want to see real values flowing through the model, you can register hooks:
def print_shape(module, input, output):
print(f"{module.__class__.__name__}: Input {input[0].shape}, Output {output.shape}")
for layer in model.children():
layer.register_forward_hook(print_shape)
# Pass sample input
X_sample = torch.randn(4, 5)
model(X_sample)
This prints real-time input/output shapes as data passes through.
For a fully interactive view, use Netron:
torch.onnx.export(model, torch.randn(1, 5), "model.onnx")
model.onnx
in Netron.summary()
Powered by ChatGPT Exporter
Input (1,5) → [fc1: (5,4)] → (1,4) → ReLU →
[fc2: (4,3)] → (1,3) → ReLU →
[fc3: (3,3)] → (1,3) → Softmax → Output
Each neuron in a layer processes all outputs from the previous layer and emits exactly one value that gets fed to all neurons in the next layer.
Here's an enhanced version of your code that includes:
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Set random seeds for reproducibility
torch.manual_seed(42)
class SimpleNN(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(SimpleNN, self).__init__()
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(5, 4) # First hidden layer: 5 in, 4 out
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(4, 3) # Second hidden layer: 4 in, 3 out
self.fc3 = nn.Linear(3, 3) # Output layer: 3 in, 3 out (classes)
def forward(self, x):
# First hidden layer with ReLU activation
x = F.relu(self.fc1(x))
# Second hidden layer with ReLU activation
x = F.relu(self.fc2(x))
# Output layer (no activation here, CrossEntropyLoss includes softmax)
x = self.fc3(x)
return x
# Generate synthetic dataset
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=5, n_classes=3,
n_informative=3, random_state=42)
# Split into train and validation sets
X_train, X_val, y_train, y_val = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
# Convert to PyTorch tensors
X_train = torch.FloatTensor(X_train)
y_train = torch.LongTensor(y_train)
X_val = torch.FloatTensor(X_val)
y_val = torch.LongTensor(y_val)
# Create a network instance
model = SimpleNN()
# Define loss function and optimizer
criterion = nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=0.01)
# Training parameters
epochs = 100
batch_size = 32
train_losses = []
val_losses = []
train_accuracies = []
val_accuracies = []
# Training loop
for epoch in range(epochs):
model.train()
epoch_train_loss = 0
correct_train = 0
total_train = 0
# Mini-batch training
for i in range(0, len(X_train), batch_size):
# Get batch
batch_X = X_train[i:i+batch_size]
batch_y = y_train[i:i+batch_size]
# Zero gradients
optimizer.zero_grad()
# Forward pass
outputs = model(batch_X)
loss = criterion(outputs, batch_y)
# Backward pass and optimize
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
# Track metrics
epoch_train_loss += loss.item()
_, predicted = torch.max(outputs.data, 1)
total_train += batch_y.size(0)
correct_train += (predicted == batch_y).sum().item()
# Calculate training metrics
train_loss = epoch_train_loss / (len(X_train) / batch_size)
train_accuracy = correct_train / total_train
train_losses.append(train_loss)
train_accuracies.append(train_accuracy)
# Validation
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
val_outputs = model(X_val)
val_loss = criterion(val_outputs, y_val)
_, val_predicted = torch.max(val_outputs.data, 1)
val_accuracy = (val_predicted == y_val).sum().item() / len(y_val)
val_losses.append(val_loss.item())
val_accuracies.append(val_accuracy)
# Print progress
if (epoch+1) % 10 == 0:
print(f'Epoch [{epoch+1}/{epochs}], '
f'Train Loss: {train_loss:.4f}, Val Loss: {val_loss.item():.4f}, '
f'Train Acc: {train_accuracy:.4f}, Val Acc: {val_accuracy:.4f}')
# Plot training history
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 5))
plt.subplot(1, 2, 1)
plt.plot(train_losses, label='Train Loss')
plt.plot(val_losses, label='Val Loss')
plt.title('Loss over epochs')
plt.legend()
plt.subplot(1, 2, 2)
plt.plot(train_accuracies, label='Train Accuracy')
plt.plot(val_accuracies, label='Val Accuracy')
plt.title('Accuracy over epochs')
plt.legend()
plt.show()
# Final evaluation
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
# Test on validation set
outputs = model(X_val)
_, predicted = torch.max(outputs.data, 1)
final_accuracy = (predicted == y_val).sum().item() / len(y_val)
print(f'\nFinal Validation Accuracy: {final_accuracy:.4f}')
Complete Training Loop:
Loss Function:
Optimization:
Evaluation Metrics:
Data Handling:
Model Evaluation:
This code provides a complete framework for training and evaluating your neural network, with all the essential components of a deep learning pipeline.